COMPARISON

AxiaOS vs. Northbeam

The most sophisticated multi-touch attribution vendor in the DTC space, respected among advanced media buyers. Two accounting modes (accrual and cash), seven attribution models, configurable attribution windows.

HEAD TO HEAD

The questions worth asking before you sign

QUESTION

Where does your data live?

NORTHBEAM

In Northbeam's platform, reached through their product. They describe it as first-party tracking infrastructure. It runs on their systems, under their terms.

AXIAOS

On new builds, in your own Google Cloud account, under your billing. You hold the keys, the schema and the history.

QUESTION

What happens if you cancel?

NORTHBEAM

The number stops being produced. The models and logic that generated it stay on Northbeam's side, and whatever you can export is a copy of their output.

AXIAOS

Nothing is lost. On new builds, the warehouse, the logic and the history sit in your account and stay there. Hosted accounts are kept in a transferable state.

QUESTION

Who measures the result?

NORTHBEAM

With Apex, Northbeam feeds its own attribution to Meta to optimize against, and its published case studies report the lift in Northbeam's own numbers. The platform doing the optimizing also does the scoring.

AXIAOS

Results get checked against your own orders in your own warehouse, with Meta's and Google's claims shown beside them, labeled as claims.

QUESTION

How does revenue attribution work?

NORTHBEAM

Accrual mode fractionally splits your revenue across touchpoints. A single order becomes slivers of credit spread across days, allocated by their algorithm.

AXIAOS

Never modeled. Every dollar traces to one real, dated event.

QUESTION

How are view-through conversions counted?

NORTHBEAM

Their “Modeled Views” layer uses machine learning to infer view-through conversions. Their own documentation states it needs 25 to 30 days to “establish reliable patterns.”

AXIAOS

No inference. If something can't be verified against a real event, it's labeled as a gap, never filled in with a guess.

QUESTION

Is the methodology auditable?

NORTHBEAM

Their attribution methodology page doesn't publish identity-resolution detail or model math. “Unbiased” is stated, not demonstrated.

AXIAOS

Nothing to take on faith. On new builds, every calculation runs inside your own environment.

QUESTION

Do the numbers stay stable over time?

NORTHBEAM

Accrual credit accumulates as customer journeys complete, so a given week's reported ROAS can read differently once it's revisited the following week.

AXIAOS

A number, once recorded, doesn't change retroactively.

QUESTION

How are returns handled?

NORTHBEAM

In cash mode, revenue can run higher than Shopify because refunds aren't netted out.

AXIAOS

Returns net against revenue the same way finance already closes the books.

QUESTION

How many versions of "the truth" exist?

NORTHBEAM

Seven attribution models, times seven windows, times two accounting modes, is roughly 100 possible configurations. Different stakeholders can select the one that suits their narrative.

AXIAOS

One number. Traceable to source, the same every time it runs.

WHERE THEY'RE GENUINELY STRONG

Northbeam has genuine credibility with advanced media buyers, strong creative-level analytics, and the accrual concept itself is a real, useful lens on time-distributed value. One independent reviewer who compared five major attribution platforms called Northbeam's data “by far the most accurate and consistent” among them. Buyers' real complaints cluster on onboarding, support responsiveness, and cost, not on whether the numbers themselves are wrong. Public pricing starts around $1,500/mo and scales with data volume, positioned for accounts well above the $50K/mo range.

Doesn’t Northbeam already offer first-party tracking infrastructure?

By their own description, yes. The question is whether anyone checks the numbers it produces against your real orders. AxiaOS does that, and you can keep Northbeam on top of it if your media buyer likes the workflow.

Isn’t multi-touch attribution more accurate than first-touch?

It can be more sophisticated. Accuracy is a separate question, and a model that can't be independently checked is hard to validate either way. AxiaOS's position: a fully auditable first-touch record, shown alongside what each platform claims with the honest gaps labeled, is worth more than a model nobody outside the vendor can verify.

EVIDENCE

“extremely hard onboarding with very little empathy and understanding”

Trustpilot review

“We have tried all 5 of the biggest attribution platforms out there and Northbeam's data is by far the most accurate and consistent.”

Capterra review

See what a deterministic, owned foundation looks like against your own numbers.